Middle School Students’ Motivation and Quality of Experience: A Comparison of Montessori and Traditional School Environments
American Journal of Education
Vol. 111, No. 3 (May 2005), pp. 341-371
Vol. 111, No. 3 (May 2005), pp. 341-371
"This study compared the motivation and quality of experience of demographically matched students from Montessori and traditional middle school programs." The study depicts "greater affect, potency (i.e., feeling energetic), intrinsic motivation, flow experience, and undivided interest (i.e., the combination of high intrinsic motivation and high salience or importance) while engaged in academic activities at school" by students in the Montessori schools. Both groups tested equally when it came to taking part in informal, nonacademic activities.
Another study that was conducted explored adolescents and their learning environments. Half were tested in a Montessori School setting, and the other half were tested in "traditional public middle schools" The results showed a higher intrinsic motivation in the students from the Montessori school. This section of the article discusses how the traditional classroom environments does not offer as much as a Montessori school does.
"What can be learned from research that compares Montessori and traditional middle schools? There are two main benefits. First, there has been an absence of empirical research in Montessori schools; this is especially true in adolescence, but it is also true with respect to early childhood education (Loeffler 1992).A second benefit of this comparison is more relevant for developmental thought and educational research. Over the last 15 years, a great deal of effort has been invested in diagnosing and designing classroom and schoolwide interventions that may enhance adolescents’ motivation" This seems to be a big part of the Montessori community. Establishing an environment that promotes learning and enhances student's curiosity.

This image is of the prepared environment in a Montessori Classroom.
Another study that was conducted explored adolescents and their learning environments. Half were tested in a Montessori School setting, and the other half were tested in "traditional public middle schools" The results showed a higher intrinsic motivation in the students from the Montessori school. This section of the article discusses how the traditional classroom environments does not offer as much as a Montessori school does.
"What can be learned from research that compares Montessori and traditional middle schools? There are two main benefits. First, there has been an absence of empirical research in Montessori schools; this is especially true in adolescence, but it is also true with respect to early childhood education (Loeffler 1992).A second benefit of this comparison is more relevant for developmental thought and educational research. Over the last 15 years, a great deal of effort has been invested in diagnosing and designing classroom and schoolwide interventions that may enhance adolescents’ motivation" This seems to be a big part of the Montessori community. Establishing an environment that promotes learning and enhances student's curiosity.
This image is of the prepared environment in a Montessori Classroom.